watteau pierot Jean-Antoine Watteau (1684-1721)
Jean-Antoine Watteau – watteau pierot
Edit attribution
Download full size: 776×1000 px (0,2 Mb)
Painter: Jean-Antoine Watteau
Antoine Watteau was a major French painter, a kind of prophet of the Rococo style, who favored mythical and narrative scenes. He also paid much attention to actors in their traditional roles. His paintings are usually executed with great skill and attention to detail, loaded with both meaning and characters and the minutiae from which the interiors are created. Gilles in France refers to the familiar Pierrot, who was born in Italy, being the mask of comedy del arte.
Description of Antoine Watteau’s painting Gilles
Antoine Watteau was a major French painter, a kind of prophet of the Rococo style, who favored mythical and narrative scenes. He also paid much attention to actors in their traditional roles. His paintings are usually executed with great skill and attention to detail, loaded with both meaning and characters and the minutiae from which the interiors are created.
Gilles in France refers to the familiar Pierrot, who was born in Italy, being the mask of comedy del arte. Originally his role was that of another servant, Harlequin’s eternal rival, a small cunning and dodgy one, cleverly disguising it with outward gentleness and clumsiness.
But all his plans often fell through and failed, Colombine left him for Harlequin and one day the image of Pierrot was reinvented. From the comic character he became a tragic one, gradually transforming from a shyster to the unhappy and persecuted lover.
It is in this image that Pierrot appears in Watteau’s painting. In spite of the people around him, he is alone. The play is over, everyone is busy minding their own business, and he stands on the hill with a look of confusion and incomprehension.
The lowered skyline elevates him above the others, turning the picture into a portrait and indicating how different his colleagues’ level of thinking and interests are. They are indifferent to Pierrot, preoccupied with conversation, and their role in his life is no greater than that of a statue of a faun looking serious and foolish. He is dressed in his traditional costume. The pointed hat, pushed to the back of his head, bears a vague resemblance to a halo.
Playing a tragic and misunderstood character, Pierrot remains the same in life, unnecessary, rejected by everyone and understood by no one.
He looks at the spectator sadly and as if begging, as if to suggest that it is in the power of those looking at him to relieve him of this deathly longing.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
Flanking him on either side are other figures, seemingly observing or interacting with the central character. To the left, a face emerges from shadow, partially obscured but displaying similar costume elements – the distinctive ruff and white garments. On the right, two younger individuals, one wearing a bright red cap, appear to be looking up at the man in white, their expressions suggesting curiosity or perhaps admiration. Their positioning creates a sense of hierarchy within the scene; they are relegated to the periphery, observing from below.
The landscape behind is rendered with soft focus and muted tones, characteristic of an idyllic pastoral setting. Tall trees punctuate the horizon line, while hints of rolling hills suggest depth. The light appears diffused, creating a gentle atmosphere that contrasts with the theatricality of the costumed figures.
Subtleties in the work hint at themes of performance, observation, and social dynamics. The central figure’s detached gaze suggests an awareness of his role as a performer, while the onlookers imply a separation between those who perform and those who witness. The use of costume, particularly the stark white attire, could be interpreted as symbolic – perhaps representing purity, innocence, or even a deliberate masking of identity. The landscape itself contributes to this sense of artifice; it is not a realistic depiction but rather an idealized backdrop for the unfolding drama. Ultimately, the painting invites contemplation on the nature of spectacle and the complexities of human interaction within a constructed environment.