Joseph Wright of Derby – An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump
1768
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
At the heart of the arrangement stands a man in formal attire, presumably the scientist conducting the demonstration. He gestures towards the glass pump, his expression seemingly neutral or detached, yet contributing to an atmosphere of clinical observation. A white bird is suspended within the apparatus, its form partially visible through the glass. The artist has rendered it with meticulous detail, emphasizing its fragility and vulnerability.
Surrounding the scientist are several onlookers, each reacting differently to the unfolding event. A young girl in a pink dress stands closest to the pump, her face etched with distress and tears. Her posture conveys profound empathy for the birds plight. To her right, an older woman displays a similar expression of sorrow, while a younger boy leans towards them, seemingly absorbing their emotional response. Further back, other figures display varying degrees of curiosity or detached interest. A man in a red coat appears to be gesturing animatedly, perhaps explaining the scientific principles at play, while another figure observes with a more passive gaze.
The setting is an interior space, likely a domestic parlor or study, suggested by the ornate wallpaper and the presence of a birdcage visible through a window. The window itself offers a glimpse of a moonlit night sky, creating a visual contrast between the artificial light of the experiment and the natural world beyond. This juxtaposition may symbolize the tension between scientific inquiry and the inherent beauty and mystery of nature.
Beyond the literal depiction of a scientific demonstration, the painting explores themes of empathy, mortality, and the ethical implications of scientific progress. The emotional responses of the onlookers suggest a questioning of the cost of knowledge and the potential for human intervention to disrupt natural processes. The young girl’s distress serves as a poignant counterpoint to the scientists seemingly objective demeanor, prompting reflection on the moral responsibility that accompanies scientific advancement. The overall effect is one of profound psychological complexity, inviting viewers to contemplate the intersection of science, emotion, and morality.