Rijksmuseum: part 1 – Ostade, Adriaen van -- De kwakzalver, 1648
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The audience consists primarily of villagers, depicted in simpler clothing – coarse wool garments and wide-brimmed hats – suggesting their lower social standing. Their expressions are varied; some appear captivated by the spectacle, others skeptical, and a few seem merely indifferent. A small child, positioned directly in front of the stall, stares with an open curiosity that contrasts with the more guarded looks of the adults.
A large barrel dominates the foreground, serving as both a table for the charlatan’s wares and a visual barrier between him and the audience. Scattered around the base of the barrel are various containers and tools, hinting at the range of remedies or trinkets he offers. A partially visible horse stands in the background, adding to the sense of an itinerant presence disrupting the quiet rhythm of village life.
The lighting is subdued, with a dramatic contrast between the darker areas beneath the tent and the brighter patches illuminating the figures. This creates a theatrical effect, drawing attention to the central figure and emphasizing his performative role. The artist employed a muted palette dominated by browns, grays, and greens, which contributes to the overall atmosphere of realism and social commentary.
Subtleties within the composition suggest a critique of popular beliefs and practices. The charlatan’s flamboyant appearance and exaggerated gestures imply deception or at least questionable methods. The villagers mixed reactions – ranging from gullibility to suspicion – reflect the complexities of human nature and the vulnerability of those seeking solutions, whether genuine or illusory. The presence of the horse and the temporary stall suggest a transient existence, highlighting the precariousness of both the charlatan’s livelihood and the villagers’ trust. Ultimately, the painting offers a glimpse into the social dynamics of 17th-century rural life, where superstition and commerce intersected in often ambiguous ways.