Rijksmuseum: part 1 – Hoet, Gerard (I) -- Het huwelijk van Alexander de Grote met Roxane van Bactrië, 1670-1733
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The foreground is populated by numerous figures engaged in what appears to be a ceremonial event. A central couple stands poised for union; one figure, clad in military attire indicative of leadership, gestures towards the other, who wears flowing robes and exhibits an expression of restrained emotion. The act of joining them seems to involve the presentation of a ring or similar token by a kneeling individual, further emphasizing the ritualistic nature of the occasion.
Around this central pair, a throng of onlookers is arranged in varying degrees of proximity and engagement. Some appear to be actively participating in the ceremony, while others observe with expressions ranging from solemnity to apparent revelry. The artist has employed a range of gestures and poses to convey these differing reactions – some figures raise their hands in blessing or celebration, while others lean forward intently, seemingly absorbed in the unfolding events.
A large, draped fabric hangs prominently behind the central couple, its warm tones contrasting with the cooler palette of the architectural backdrop. This textile serves not only as a visual element but also potentially as a symbolic barrier between the participants and the observing crowd. The lighting is dramatic, highlighting key figures and creating areas of deep shadow that contribute to the scenes theatricality.
Subtleties within the painting suggest layers of meaning beyond a simple depiction of a union. The presence of military regalia alongside symbols of festivity implies a complex interplay between power, duty, and personal desire. The statue in the background could be interpreted as representing the divine sanction or legitimization of this alliance. The varied expressions among the onlookers hint at underlying tensions or political considerations surrounding the event – perhaps reflecting differing opinions on its significance or potential consequences. Overall, the work conveys a sense of grandeur and ceremony, while simultaneously hinting at the complexities inherent in matters of power, love, and obligation.