Frederick Remington – The Advance-Guard, or The Military Sacrifice (The Ambush)
1890. 87×123 cm
Location: Art Institute, Chicago.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The foreground presents three figures on horseback, caught in the midst of chaotic movement. The central figure, positioned prominently, appears to be reacting with alarm; his posture conveys a sense of sudden shock or warning. He raises one arm defensively while holding the reins tightly, and his horse rears up dramatically, kicking out its hind legs. To the right, another rider is depicted in a more aggressive stance, brandishing a weapon – likely a saber – and leaning forward as if charging. A third figure, further back within the gorge, appears to be observing or participating in the action, though their role remains less clear.
The ground beneath the horses is disturbed, with loose stones and dust kicked up by their hooves, emphasizing the speed and violence of the encounter. A discarded rifle lies on the ground near the front edge of the composition, a stark symbol of potential loss or sacrifice. The placement of this object draws attention to the vulnerability inherent in the situation.
The artist’s use of light contributes significantly to the scenes dramatic effect. Strong illumination highlights the horses and riders, creating sharp contrasts with the shadowed canyon walls. This interplay of light and shadow amplifies the sense of danger and uncertainty.
Subtly, the painting explores themes of vulnerability and the precariousness of military advance. The constricted setting – the narrow gorge – suggests a lack of maneuverability and an increased risk of ambush. The horses’ agitated state underscores the unpredictable nature of conflict and the potential for sudden disaster. The discarded rifle serves as a poignant reminder of the human cost of war, hinting at a larger narrative of loss and sacrifice beyond what is immediately visible in this moment. The overall impression is one of tense anticipation and impending peril, suggesting that the depicted event is not merely an isolated incident but part of a broader military campaign with significant consequences.