Nikolai Karazin – Crossing of the Turkestan detachment through the Amu Darya in 1873
1889. Oil on canvas. 178x322 cm
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is structured around several focal points. In the foreground, a chaotic melee unfolds on a sandy bank. Soldiers clash amidst swirling dust and smoke, their postures suggesting intense combat. Further back, along the river’s edge, a more organized procession of men and horses moves steadily towards the opposite shore. The artist has rendered the water with a muted palette, reflecting the harsh light and creating an impression of both depth and distance.
The landscape itself is stark and arid. A low horizon line punctuated by distant hills reinforces the feeling of isolation and the challenging environment faced by those involved. The sky, painted in pale hues, contributes to the overall atmosphere of tension and uncertainty.
Beyond the immediate depiction of military action, several subtexts emerge. The painting seems to explore themes of imperial expansion and conquest. The orderly progression of the soldiers contrasts sharply with the disarray of the foreground battle, suggesting a narrative of controlled force overcoming resistance. The vastness of the landscape underscores the ambition and scope of the endeavor, while also hinting at the potential for isolation and hardship in such ventures.
The artist’s attention to detail – the rendering of individual faces, the texture of uniforms, the depiction of horses – lends a sense of realism to the scene. However, this realism is tempered by a romanticized portrayal of military heroism; the soldiers are presented as resolute figures facing adversity with apparent courage. The overall effect is one of grand spectacle, designed to convey both the power and the complexity of colonial enterprise.