Hill Roerich N.K. (Part 5)
Roerich N.K. – Hill
1939. Tempera on cardboard. 30.5 x 45.7 cm.
Edit attribution
Download full size: 789×521 px (0,1 Mb)
Back to album: Roerich N.K. (Part 5)
Location: The State Museum of Oriental Art, Moscow (Государственный музей искусства народов Востока).
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The artist employed a distinctive style characterized by angularity and flattened planes. Rather than attempting a realistic depiction of topography, the hills are constructed from geometric shapes – triangles, trapezoids, and rectangles – that overlap and intersect. This approach lends an abstract quality to the landscape, suggesting a focus on form and structure over naturalistic representation. The application of paint appears deliberate; brushstrokes are visible but generally controlled, contributing to a sense of solidity and weight in the depicted forms.
A subtle use of warmer tones – ochre and brown – appears within the folds and crevices of the hills, providing visual interest and hinting at variations in terrain or light conditions. These touches prevent the scene from becoming entirely monochromatic and introduce a degree of complexity. The interplay between these warm and cool colors creates a sense of depth, even though the perspective is ambiguous and lacks traditional vanishing points.
Subtly, theres an impression of isolation conveyed by the painting. The absence of any human presence or signs of civilization reinforces this feeling. The limited color range and the stark contrast between the dark foreground and the blue-gray landscape evoke a mood of quiet contemplation or perhaps even melancholy. It is possible to interpret the work as a meditation on the enduring nature of the land, stripped bare of sentimentality and presented in its essential geometric form. The painting’s strength lies not in its representation of a specific place but rather in its ability to convey an emotional response through simplified forms and a restrained color scheme.