Philadelphia Museum of Art – Joseph Mallord William Turner, English, 1775-1851 -- The Burning of the Houses of Lords and Commons, October 16, 1834
1835. 92.1 x 123.2 cm
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist employed a loose, expressive brushstroke throughout the work. Details are sacrificed to evoke a feeling rather than depict precise forms. The architecture itself is reduced to an almost abstract arrangement of lines and shapes, emphasizing its vulnerability against the power of the elements. This technique contributes to the overall impression of overwhelming force and loss.
Along the lower edge of the painting, a crowd gathers on the riverbank, their figures rendered as indistinct masses. They appear to be spectators, observing the devastation from a distance. Their presence introduces an element of human scale into the scene, highlighting the magnitude of the event unfolding before them. The boats in the water mirror this sense of detachment; they are positioned between the viewer and the destruction, further emphasizing the spectacle of it all.
The river itself acts as a reflective surface, mirroring the fiery sky and the burning structures. This creates a visual doubling effect, amplifying the intensity of the scene. It also suggests a cyclical nature to destruction and renewal – a common theme in Romantic art.
Beyond the immediate depiction of a catastrophic event, subtexts emerge concerning the fragility of human constructions and the power of natural forces. The painting seems to question notions of permanence and stability, suggesting that even grand institutions are susceptible to unforeseen events. Theres an underlying commentary on the relationship between humanity and nature – a theme central to Romantic thought – where the sublime beauty of the sky is intertwined with a devastating act of destruction. The indistinctness of the figures also hints at a broader sense of societal anxiety or perhaps, a critique of passive observation in times of crisis.