Konstantin Flavizky – Children of Jacob sold their brother Joseph
1855
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Группу покупателей слева больше интересует молодой верблюд, чем какой-то Иосиф
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a palette dominated by earth tones – ochres, browns, and muted greens – which contribute to the overall sense of desolation and moral ambiguity. Strong contrasts in light and shadow heighten the emotional intensity; the younger figure is bathed in a soft glow, drawing attention to his exposed skin and apparent innocence, while the faces of the men are partially obscured by shadows, hinting at their concealed motives.
Several figures exhibit distinct postures that reveal their individual roles within this narrative. One man, presumably an elder, appears to be attempting to mediate or perhaps rationalize the unfolding events, his hand raised in a gesture that could signify either authority or appeasement. Others are actively involved in leading the younger figure away, their grips firm and resolute. A few stand back, seemingly conflicted, their faces etched with expressions of discomfort or regret.
The presence of camels and goats reinforces the setting as one of nomadic life, suggesting a harsh environment where survival might necessitate difficult choices. The landscape itself is rendered with a degree of realism, but it also serves to isolate the group, emphasizing their separation from any broader societal context.
Subtly, the artist uses clothing to differentiate between characters and suggest social standing. The younger figure’s simple white garment contrasts sharply with the more elaborate robes worn by some of the men, potentially indicating a difference in status or privilege. This visual distinction underscores the power dynamics at play within the scene.
Beyond the literal depiction of an event, the painting seems to explore themes of familial betrayal, moral compromise, and the consequences of ambition. The younger figure’s passivity invites contemplation about the nature of innocence and vulnerability in the face of adversity. The overall effect is one of profound psychological tension, leaving the viewer to grapple with the complexities of human behavior and the enduring power of narrative.