malevich the aviator 1914 Kazimir Malevich (1879-1935)
Kazimir Malevich – malevich the aviator 1914
Edit attribution
Download full size: 753×1500 px (0,2 Mb)
Painter: Kazimir Malevich
Album navigation:
Malevich was a Russian avant-garde artist whose paintings continue to be deciphered to this day. "The Black Square, his most famous work, is still a source of debate to this day; some regard it as utterly meaningless, others see in it subtle symbolism and a prophecy of the end of art. Such are all his works, even the not so famous ones. It is difficult and not always possible to interpret them from the standpoint of reason; on the contrary, Malevich’s language is the language of associations and symbols, difficult to understand if one tries to decipher it in words. Malevich’s language is a mockery of the rigidity and cramped nature of even the creative thinking of society, which sets limits for everyone, even for artists.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of Kazimir Malevich’s painting The Aviator
Malevich was a Russian avant-garde artist whose paintings continue to be deciphered to this day. "The Black Square, his most famous work, is still a source of debate to this day; some regard it as utterly meaningless, others see in it subtle symbolism and a prophecy of the end of art. Such are all his works, even the not so famous ones. It is difficult and not always possible to interpret them from the standpoint of reason; on the contrary, Malevich’s language is the language of associations and symbols, difficult to understand if one tries to decipher it in words.
Malevich’s language is a mockery of the rigidity and cramped nature of even the creative thinking of society, which sets limits for everyone, even for artists. Malevich is a reformist who sought to reshape people’s perception, to show them that beauty is not at all dependent on the logical meaning and its explanation from the standpoint of reason.
"Aviator" - one of his paintings-mysteries, which everyone is free to interpret as they wish. If you want, you can link it with biblical motifs and images, you can, on the contrary, see in it an ardent communism. In fact, it is a picture of a puzzle that seems to have nothing to do with its title.
The man in it is torn out of the familiar world, placed in a world of flat forms, bizarre inscriptions that make no sense, strange abstractions. He looks like a viewer who is trying to understand Malevich’s ideas, he is wearing a cylinder, emitting light, he is crossed by a white fish, which literally glows with whiteness. And he clearly doesn’t understand where he is.
He has an ace of spades in his hand, all around him is something inarticulate and without meaning. It is as if he is flying in the shining nothingness, like a pilot lost between heaven and earth. Everyone is free to come up with his own explanation and associate it with his own ideas, because everyone is free to perceive any picture the way he personally wants.
If you look closely, "The Aviator" is about freedom.
You cannot comment Why?
Behind the figure, a chaotic arrangement of letters – seemingly Cyrillic – is visible, partially obscured by overlapping shapes and planes. These textual elements are not legible in their entirety but contribute to a feeling of dynamism and disruption. The background itself is composed of similarly fractured forms, utilizing a palette of ochre, yellow, brown, and grey, which creates a sense of depth through layered perspectives.
The artist’s use of perspective is unconventional; the figure appears simultaneously frontal and oblique, defying traditional spatial representation. This distortion contributes to the works unsettling quality and suggests an attempt to move beyond conventional pictorial space. The overall effect is one of controlled chaos – a deliberate dismantling of recognizable forms in favor of a more abstract and symbolic language.
Subtly embedded within this fractured landscape are hints of aviation imagery, most notably the suggestion of wings extending from behind the figure’s head. This detail implies themes of progress, modernity, and perhaps even the anxieties associated with technological advancement. The formal attire of the central figure contrasts sharply with these elements of flight, creating a tension between tradition and innovation.
The work seems to explore the intersection of human identity, technology, and the rapidly changing social landscape of its time. It is not merely a portrait but rather an investigation into the fragmented nature of experience in a world undergoing profound transformation.