Unknown painters – Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester
c.1587. 81×65
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s garments immediately convey status and authority. He wears a crimson doublet heavily embroidered with intricate patterns of pearls and gold thread. A broad collar, also richly adorned, encircles his neck, displaying heraldic symbols – a coat of arms featuring a lion rampant within an escutcheon. The presence of a sword hilt at his waist further reinforces the image of military or political power. A feathered plume emerges from beneath a dark cap, adding to the overall impression of grandeur and ceremonial importance.
A lengthy inscription is visible in the upper right corner, detailing titles and offices held by the subject – “Earl of Leicester, Lord Steward of His Majesty’s Household, Controller of the Duchy of Cornwall, Constable of Windsor Castle, and Captain of the Guard, one of his Majestys most honorable Privy Council.” This text serves not only to identify him but also to underscore the breadth of his influence.
The composition is carefully structured to project an image of controlled power and dignity. The direct gaze establishes a connection with the viewer, demanding respect and attention. The dark background isolates the figure, preventing distraction from the symbols of rank and authority that define him. While the expression appears serious, theres a subtle hint of melancholy in his eyes, which might suggest the burdens associated with high office or perhaps an awareness of mortality.
The overall effect is one of carefully constructed persona – a man who wishes to be perceived as powerful, responsible, and deeply embedded within the structures of authority. The portrait functions not merely as a likeness but as a statement about status, duty, and the complexities inherent in holding significant political power.