Unknown painters – Emblems for Royal Crown Lodge No. 22
1810~15. 63×80 cm. English, 19th century
Location: Art Institute, Chicago.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The shield itself is structured around a central sunburst motif, radiating outwards and dominating the visual field. Below this, a pair of hands clasped in fellowship are prominently displayed, symbolizing unity and brotherhood – a core tenet of the organization to which this emblem pertains. The lower portion of the shield contains a series of smaller, more disparate symbols arranged across three horizontal registers. These include a lamb (often associated with innocence or sacrifice), a heart (representing love and compassion), a skull (a memento mori reminding viewers of mortality), and an eye within a triangle (a symbol frequently linked to vigilance and divine oversight). A small pyramid is also visible, possibly alluding to the building of something lasting.
On either side of the central shield stand two men in military-style uniforms, each holding a sword upright. The figure on the left bears a banner reading Amicitia (Latin for friendship), while the one on the right holds a banner proclaiming Veritas (truth). These banners underscore key values championed by the group. A third banner at the bottom of the composition reads “Amor et” (love and), suggesting an incomplete phrase, perhaps intended to be continued within the context of the organizations rituals or teachings.
The overall effect is one of deliberate solemnity and hierarchical structure. The arrangement suggests a system of values and beliefs presented as both aspirational and foundational. The use of classical imagery combined with Masonic symbols creates a visual language that aims to convey authority, moral uprightness, and a commitment to shared ideals. The painting’s style, while technically competent, possesses a certain rigidity, reinforcing the impression of formality and adherence to established tradition.