El Greco – Portrait of a Cardinal, Probably Cardinal Don Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541–1609)
c. 1600. 170,8 108
Location: Metropolitan Museum of Arts, New York.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
НИНО ДЕ ГЕВАРА
В чём соль жизни Нино де Гевара?
Властный – как приказ, иль как пароль,
С острым взглядом через окуляры,
Исполнял значительную роль.
Да, в системе церкви чрезвычайна
Роль была.
В соборе плакал он.
В нём жила, как боль, такая тайна,
Что и жизнь его была, как фон.
В Тициана мастерской когда-то
Молодому живописцу он,
Улыбнувшись – Так на свет богата –
Рёк – Испания.
И путь решён.
Путь решён – на нём возник Эль Греко.
Нино де Гевара в том веков
Помещён логично, точно, крепко –
Взят из жизненных черновиков.
You cannot comment Why?
The most striking element of the work is the vibrant crimson garment enveloping the figure. This elaborate robe, likely indicative of ecclesiastical rank, dominates the visual field with its rich color and complex folds. The texture of the fabric is rendered with considerable detail, suggesting both opulence and weight. White gloves adorn his hands, a customary signifier of status and refinement during this period. A distinctive red biretta sits atop his head, further reinforcing his position within the Church hierarchy. He wears spectacles, which add an element of intellectualism to his portrayal; they suggest a man engaged in study or contemplation.
The background is deliberately subdued, consisting primarily of dark wood paneling on the left and a textured wall surface on the right. The limited depth of field directs attention squarely onto the subject. Light falls upon him from an unseen source, illuminating his face and highlighting the folds of his clothing. This creates a sense of three-dimensionality and emphasizes the materiality of the garments.
Beyond the straightforward depiction of a man in ceremonial dress, the painting conveys subtle subtexts regarding power and authority. The deliberate formality of the pose, coupled with the richness of the attire, speaks to a position of considerable influence. The slightly averted gaze suggests an individual accustomed to deference and perhaps even burdened by responsibility. The spectacles introduce a layer of intellectualism, implying not only spiritual authority but also scholarly pursuits. Overall, the work is less about capturing a likeness and more about constructing an image of dignified power and learned piety.