На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has rendered her with a fair skin tone and delicate features – a slightly parted mouth suggests a subtle smile, while her eyes convey a sense of composure and intelligence. Her hair is styled in elaborate curls, partially concealed by a dark veil adorned with feathers, indicative of contemporary fashion trends. The most striking element of the portrait is undoubtedly the intricate ruff encircling her neck; its layered folds are meticulously depicted, demonstrating considerable technical skill. Beneath the ruff, we see glimpses of a richly embroidered bodice, further emphasizing her status and wealth. A delicate necklace adorns her chest, adding another layer of ornamentation.
The hands are positioned in a gesture of quiet elegance – one rests on what appears to be a dark fabric draped over her shoulder, while the other is held gently before her. A ring is visible on her left hand, suggesting marital status. In the upper left corner, numerals – 1616” and “22” – are inscribed, likely denoting the year of creation and perhaps an age or significant date related to the sitter.
Beyond a straightforward depiction of a woman in fashionable dress, the painting conveys subtexts relating to social standing and identity. The elaborate costume and jewelry signal considerable wealth and privilege. The direct gaze suggests confidence and self-assurance, while the restrained expression hints at a carefully constructed public persona. The dark background contributes to an atmosphere of formality and solemnity, reinforcing the sitter’s importance within her community. Overall, the portrait serves as a visual document of status, beauty, and societal expectations during this period.