На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The setting itself contributes significantly to the painting’s atmosphere. A stone wall covered with climbing roses defines one side of the scene, suggesting a boundary between cultivated space and wilder nature. Dense foliage frames the view down the path, creating a sense of enclosure and intimacy while also hinting at an expansive landscape beyond. The light is dappled, filtering through the trees to illuminate patches of the ground and highlight the figures.
The arrangement of the subjects suggests a moment of quiet observation or perhaps gentle interaction. The man’s posture – leaning casually against the fence – implies a relaxed authority, while the girls actions convey innocence and engagement with their immediate surroundings. There is an element of narrative ambiguity; it is unclear whether the man is a father, guardian, or simply a benevolent observer.
The presence of a small stool near the younger girl suggests a habitual activity – perhaps she regularly collects something from this spot. The scattered objects on the ground, and the bird at the bottom right corner, add to the sense of naturalism and unposed spontaneity.
Subtly, the painting evokes themes of childhood, domesticity, and social class. The man’s formal attire contrasts with the girls simpler clothing, hinting at a potential difference in status or role. The overgrown nature of the garden might symbolize a gentle neglect or a romanticized view of rural life. Overall, the work conveys a sense of tranquil observation and understated narrative, inviting contemplation on the relationships between individuals and their environment.