David Frumerie (Attributed) – Sigismund I (1467-1548), King of Poland
1667.
Location: National Museum (Nationalmuseum), Stockholm.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a figure clad in layered garments – a dark brown outer robe lined with grey fur, worn over what appears to be a simpler, darker tunic. The fabric drapes heavily, suggesting weight and substance, while also contributing to the overall somber tone. His hands are clasped gently before him, a gesture that conveys composure and perhaps a degree of humility rather than overt power.
The man’s face is pale, with fair hair neatly trimmed at the temples. The expression is serious, bordering on melancholic; his gaze is direct but lacks warmth. A high collar frames his neck, drawing attention to his jawline and emphasizing the formality of the presentation.
A black background dominates much of the canvas, isolating the figure and intensifying the focus on him. This stark backdrop contributes to a sense of gravity and solemnity. Above the subject’s head, an inscription in Latin identifies him with titles denoting royal authority: Sigismund D.G. Rex Poloniae Magnus Dux Lituania Russia Prussia Sua Domin. A similar inscription appears at the bottom of the painting, providing his name and dates of birth and death.
The subdued color palette – primarily browns, greys, and blacks – reinforces a sense of restraint and dignity. The lack of ornamentation or elaborate detail in the clothing suggests an emphasis on inner qualities rather than outward display. This could be interpreted as a deliberate attempt to portray the subject as a ruler concerned with substance over superficiality.
The painting’s overall effect is one of quiet authority, conveying not just royal status but also a sense of introspection and perhaps even burden. The artist seems less interested in celebrating power through lavish imagery than in presenting a portrait of a man defined by his responsibilities and the weight of his position.