Jean Baptiste Siméon Chardin – The Kitchen Maid
1738. 46x37
Location: National Gallery of Art, Washington.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The woman’s attire reinforces her social standing. The plain, functional clothing – a dark bodice over a white blouse and a red skirt – indicates practicality rather than status or adornment. A simple white cap covers her hair, further emphasizing her role as a domestic worker.
The setting itself is sparsely furnished. The table is draped with a clean but worn cloth, suggesting an environment of utility rather than luxury. Behind the woman stands a rough-hewn wooden chair and a small stand holding various kitchen implements – a meat cleaver, pots, and pans – all rendered with meticulous detail. A pile of what appear to be shelled walnuts sits on the floor near the table leg, adding another element of everyday domesticity.
The color palette is muted, dominated by earthy tones – browns, grays, and whites – which contribute to a sense of austerity and realism. The lighting is diffused, illuminating the scene without creating dramatic contrasts. This subdued illumination further emphasizes the quiet, unglamorous nature of the woman’s work.
Subtleties within the painting hint at deeper social commentary. The womans averted gaze and stooped posture could be interpreted as a reflection of her subordinate position in society. While she is actively engaged in labor, there is an absence of any visible joy or personal expression. This lack of overt emotion might suggest a critique of the conditions faced by working-class women during the period. The meticulous depiction of everyday objects – the knife, the onion, the walnuts – elevates these commonplace items to a level of significance, prompting reflection on the dignity and importance of even the most humble tasks.
The overall effect is one of quiet observation and understated social commentary. It’s not an image that shouts its message; rather, it invites contemplation about labor, class, and the often-unseen lives of those who sustain a household.