Jean Baptiste Siméon Chardin – Le singe antiquaire-the monkey as collector of antiques
1740, 81х64
Location: Louvre (Musée du Louvre), Paris.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A small table, richly colored and ornately detailed, serves as the focal point for this collection. Upon it rest several sheets of paper covered with musical notation, suggesting an interest in or perhaps a study of music. A keyboard instrument is also visible on the table’s surface, further reinforcing this association. Scattered around the base of the table are additional papers and what appears to be a small, decorative object.
The background is rendered in muted tones, creating a sense of depth and suggesting a room filled with books or other artifacts. The lighting is soft and diffused, highlighting the figure’s face and emphasizing the textures of his robe and the surrounding objects.
Several layers of meaning seem to be at play here. The depiction of an animal engaged in activities typically associated with human intellect – collecting, examining, and appreciating art and music – immediately invites a sense of irony and playful critique. It could be interpreted as a commentary on human vanity or pretension, suggesting that the pursuit of knowledge and refinement can sometimes become a form of mimicry or even absurdity when divorced from genuine understanding. The use of an animal figure allows for a distancing effect, enabling the artist to explore these themes with a degree of detachment and humor.
The choice of antique objects further complicates the narrative. They imply a reverence for the past, but also raise questions about the nature of value and authenticity. Is the primate truly appreciating these artifacts, or merely imitating the gestures of a connoisseur? The magnifying glass reinforces this ambiguity, suggesting both careful observation and a potential lack of genuine comprehension.
Ultimately, the painting offers a complex and nuanced exploration of human behavior, using the figure of an animal to provoke thought and challenge conventional notions of intellect, taste, and cultural significance.