Part 2 Prado Museum – Bayeu y Subías, Francisco -- El puente del Canal de Madrid
1784, 36 cm x 95 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Думаю, что перевод – сложная и очень ответственная работа, поэтому мой принцип – не доверяй, а проверяй!
You cannot comment Why?
To the left of the composition, a more rustic element is introduced: a cart pulled by oxen stands near a pile of what appears to be felled timber. This juxtaposition immediately establishes a contrast between industry and leisure, suggesting a commentary on societal roles or perhaps an idealized view of rural life enjoyed by urban dwellers. The figures surrounding the cart are less formally dressed, further reinforcing this distinction.
The bridge itself is not merely a structural element; it serves as a stage for additional activity. A figure sits atop the structure, seemingly observing the scene below, while others stroll across its length. This elevated position grants them a sense of authority or detachment from the convivial gathering at ground level. The waterway beneath reflects the sky and surrounding foliage, contributing to an overall atmosphere of tranquility and natural beauty.
The artist’s use of light is noteworthy. It illuminates the central group with a warm glow, drawing attention to their interactions while casting the background in softer tones. This technique creates depth and enhances the sense of perspective. The landscape beyond the bridge fades into a hazy distance, suggesting an expansive environment that extends beyond the immediate scene.
Subtly embedded within this seemingly idyllic portrayal are hints of underlying social dynamics. The contrast between the formally dressed group and those engaged in manual labor implies a hierarchical structure. The placement of figures – some actively participating, others observing from a distance – suggests varying degrees of power or influence. The bridge itself, as a symbol of connection and passage, might allude to transitions within society or the movement between different social spheres. Overall, the painting conveys an impression of a carefully constructed tableau, designed not only to depict a specific moment in time but also to offer subtle commentary on the complexities of human interaction and societal structures.