Part 2 Prado Museum – Goya y Lucientes, Francisco de -- Luis de Borbón, príncipe de Parma y rey de Etruria
1800, 72,5 cm x 59,4 cm, Lienzo, Óleo. Francisco de Goya y Lucientes
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s clothing is significant. A red coat, likely military in nature, dominates the composition, its color intensified by the surrounding ochre tones. Across his chest, a prominent order or medal is displayed, signifying high rank and status. The white cravat at his neck adds a touch of refinement to the ensemble, contrasting with the more robust texture of the coat. His hair is styled in a fashionable manner for the period, lightly powdered and arranged in soft waves.
The background’s ambiguity serves to isolate the subject, drawing attention solely to his presence. The lack of specific environmental details contributes to a sense of timelessness, elevating him beyond a mere representation of a particular moment.
Subtleties within the portrait suggest a complexity beneath the surface formality. While the mans posture and attire convey authority, there is an underlying fragility in his features – a certain vulnerability that tempers the impression of power. The muted palette, dominated by earth tones, reinforces this sense of quiet introspection. The visible brushwork, rather than being concealed, adds to the feeling of a fleeting encounter, as if the artist captured him in a moment of private reflection.
The date 1795 inscribed at the bottom right provides a temporal anchor, placing the work within a period of significant political and social upheaval. This context might suggest that the portrait is not merely a depiction of status but also an attempt to convey something about the man’s position within a rapidly changing world – a world where privilege and power were increasingly precarious.