Lucien Coutaud – #20936
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The central figure is rendered with an unsettling combination of human and animalistic features. A turban-like head covering obscures much of the face, leaving only a suggestion of eyes peering out from beneath its folds. The body is elongated and angular, clad in what seems to be a heavily ornamented garment, possibly armor or ceremonial attire. This figure’s posture conveys a sense of rigid formality, yet also vulnerability given the surrounding environment.
The equine form upon which it sits is similarly distorted, with an exaggeratedly long neck and disproportionate limbs. It lacks any naturalistic detail, instead appearing as a construct of geometric shapes. The creatures yellow hue contrasts sharply with the darker tones of the background, drawing immediate attention to its presence.
Surrounding this central pair are fractured planes and angular forms that suggest a collapsing or disintegrating structure. A staircase ascends into the upper right corner, but it too is rendered in an abstract manner, offering no clear sense of destination or escape. The red panels on the left side seem to be broken apart, creating a visual barrier. Several green, spear-like shapes jut out from the composition, adding to the feeling of threat and instability.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of power, isolation, and psychological distress. The figures ornate attire might symbolize authority or status, but its confinement within this fragmented space suggests a loss of agency or freedom. The distorted equine form could represent subjugation or an inability to move forward. The overall effect is one of profound alienation, as if the depicted individual exists in a dreamlike state where reality itself has fractured. The absence of any clear narrative further enhances the sense of ambiguity and psychological depth. It’s possible that the work explores the burden of responsibility or the fragility of societal structures under duress.