Thomas Woodward – Grey Shooting Pony, Probably the Property of Johnston King, with a Groom
1835. 43×53
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To the left of the horse, seated on a low stone wall, is a young man dressed in formal attire – a top hat and coat – a stark contrast to the ruggedness implied by the landscape. He holds a small dog close, its dark fur providing visual relief against his clothing and the pale tones of the horse. The man’s posture conveys a sense of quiet contemplation or perhaps weariness; he seems detached from the immediate environment.
Further back, partially obscured by a fence, stands another figure in hunting attire, holding what appears to be a shotgun. This individual is smaller in scale and less detailed than the central figures, suggesting a secondary role within the narrative unfolding. The landscape itself is rendered with muted tones of grey and brown, dominated by a stormy sky that contributes to an atmosphere of subdued drama. Distant hills are visible through the clouds, adding depth to the scene.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of class and leisure. The formal dress of the seated man contrasts sharply with the utilitarian purpose of the horse and the implied activity of hunting. This juxtaposition highlights a social hierarchy where individuals enjoy pursuits facilitated by others. The presence of the dog reinforces this sense of privilege, suggesting companionship and status.
The subdued lighting and overcast sky contribute to a melancholic mood, hinting at a deeper reflection on the transient nature of time and perhaps the burdens associated with responsibility or inherited position. The stillness of the horse, juxtaposed against the potential for action, could be interpreted as a metaphor for restrained power or deferred purpose. Ultimately, the work offers a glimpse into a specific social context, exploring themes of ownership, duty, and the quiet dignity of rural life.