Max Liebermann – Pigsties
c.1887. 65x80
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a group of figures engaged in what seems to be a routine farm task: feeding piglets. A woman, centrally positioned, is shown pouring feed into a trough surrounded by a cluster of small pigs. Her posture suggests both diligence and weariness; her gaze is directed downwards towards the animals, conveying a sense of focused labor. To her right, another woman and a young child observe the scene, their presence adding to the impression of familial connection and shared responsibility within this rural setting. A man stands further back in the enclosure, partially obscured by shadow, suggesting his involvement in the farm’s operations without being directly engaged in the immediate task at hand.
The pigs themselves are rendered with a degree of realism, their pink skin contrasting against the earthy tones of the surroundings. Their eagerness to feed is palpable, contributing to the overall sense of bustling activity within the confined space. A single hen stands near the trough, seemingly drawn by the commotion and potential for scraps.
Beyond the literal depiction of farm life, the painting seems to explore themes of labor, poverty, and familial bonds. The somber lighting and worn clothing of the figures suggest a difficult existence, while their collective engagement in this task implies resilience and interdependence. The presence of the child hints at the cyclical nature of rural life and the passing down of traditions from one generation to the next.
The artist’s choice to focus on such an ordinary scene – the feeding of piglets – elevates it beyond a mere depiction of agricultural practice, suggesting a commentary on the dignity of labor and the quiet struggles of those who work the land. The enclosure itself, with its rough-hewn timbers and limited space, can be interpreted as symbolic of the constraints faced by these individuals, while the animals represent both sustenance and a connection to the natural world.