Pavel Filonov – #15132
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a central figure resembling a quadrupedal creature, its form constructed from angular planes and patterned with what appears to be giraffe-like markings. This animal dominates the visual field, positioned slightly off-center and leaning forward as if in motion or perhaps straining towards something beyond the frame. Its head is rendered with an almost mask-like quality, suggesting a detachment from naturalistic representation.
Surrounding this central figure are other animal forms, similarly abstracted and fragmented. One appears to be crouching on the left side of the canvas, while another lies prone near the bottom right corner. These creatures seem less assertive than the central one, their postures conveying a sense of vulnerability or resignation.
The background is filled with blocky structures that could be interpreted as buildings or houses. They are depicted in a simplified manner, lacking detail and appearing almost like geometric shapes arranged haphazardly. A solitary tree stands on the left side, its form also reduced to basic lines and planes. The sky above is rendered in shades of blue, punctuated by what might be celestial bodies – circles that add to the surreal quality of the scene.
The painting’s subtexts likely revolve around themes of alienation, fragmentation, and the disruption of natural order. The stylized animal forms could represent a loss of innocence or a distortion of primal instincts within an increasingly industrialized world. The fragmented architecture suggests a breakdown of societal structures and a sense of displacement. The overall effect is one of psychological unease, as if the viewer has stumbled upon a hidden realm where familiar forms have been twisted into something strange and unsettling. It’s possible to interpret this work as a commentary on the impact of modernity on both the natural world and the human psyche.