Pieter Coecke Van Aelst – The Last Supper
1530.
Location: Rolin museum (Musée Rolin), Autun.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The other individuals present display a range of reactions – some appear contemplative, others agitated, and still more seem lost in their own thoughts. Their faces are rendered with considerable detail, revealing individual personalities and emotional states. The arrangement of the figures around the table is not uniform; they cluster in groups, suggesting varying degrees of closeness or conflict within the group dynamic.
A small dog sits near the lower edge of the table, its presence adding a touch of domesticity to the otherwise solemn scene. A basket filled with fruit and other provisions rests on the floor to the left, while an earthenware vessel is visible on the right. These details contribute to the sense of realism within the depiction.
The room itself is defined by simple architectural elements: a large arched window provides light from behind the table, revealing a distant landscape; two circular reliefs adorn the walls flanking the scene, adding a layer of symbolic or narrative complexity. The starkness of the background contrasts with the detailed rendering of the figures and objects in the foreground, drawing attention to the central drama unfolding within the room.
Subtleties in the composition suggest underlying tensions and foreshadowing. The gestures and expressions of the individuals hint at an awareness of a significant event about to occur, creating a palpable sense of anticipation and unease. The dogs presence might be interpreted as a symbol of loyalty or innocence, juxtaposed against the impending drama. The landscape visible through the window could represent hope or a path forward, while the reliefs on the walls may allude to historical precedents or divine intervention. Overall, the painting conveys a powerful narrative of betrayal, sacrifice, and profound spiritual significance.