На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Behind the horse, a structure – likely a building – is visible, painted in a bold red hue. This color choice immediately draws attention and creates a visual tension with the animal’s warmer tones. The architecture itself appears rudimentary, lacking detail and defined by sharp angles that mirror those found in the horses form. The background landscape is equally abstracted; hills are suggested through broad blocks of green and blue-green, while the sky displays a spectrum of pinks and purples intersected by linear bands of color – possibly intended to represent a rainbow or some other atmospheric phenomenon.
The artist’s use of flattened perspective and non-naturalistic coloration contributes to an overall feeling of emotional intensity rather than realistic representation. The deliberate distortion of form and space seems less concerned with accurate depiction and more focused on conveying a subjective experience, perhaps one of isolation or melancholy.
Subtexts within the work might relate to themes of rural life, labor, and the relationship between humanity and nature. The horse, traditionally associated with strength and industry, is presented in a vulnerable posture, suggesting a potential commentary on the changing role of animals in an increasingly industrialized world. The stark contrast between the warm tones of the animal and the aggressive red of the building could symbolize conflict or imbalance within this relationship. Ultimately, the painting’s power lies in its ability to evoke feeling through simplified forms and expressive color choices, inviting viewers to project their own interpretations onto the scene.