Andrea di Bonaiuto da Firenze – Triumph of St Thomas and Allegory of the Sciences detail2
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
On the left side, a figure stands beside an animal – likely a horse – rendered with considerable detail. This individual holds a scroll or document, suggesting a role as a scribe or messenger. Further along, we see a woman seated at a table laden with books and what appears to be astronomical instruments. Her posture conveys contemplation and scholarly focus.
The central figures are particularly striking. A man in red robes sits on a raised platform, surrounded by others who appear to be engaged in musical activities – one plays a harp, another a drum. The figure in the center of this group is dressed in a simple tunic, his gaze directed towards an unseen point beyond the frame. This central arrangement seems to function as a focal point for the entire scene.
To the right, several women are depicted, each seemingly representing a different discipline or art form. One holds what looks like a mathematical instrument, another appears to be studying a botanical specimen, and yet another is dressed in elaborate attire, possibly signifying poetry or rhetoric. An older man with spectacles sits beside her, likely engaged in study as well.
The color palette is dominated by rich earth tones – ochre, russet, and deep greens – with accents of red and blue. The figures are rendered with a degree of naturalism, although the overall style remains stylized and somewhat flattened. The architectural details are meticulously executed, contributing to the sense of grandeur and order.
Subtly, the scene conveys an allegory for knowledge and learning. Each figure seems to embody a specific field of study or artistic endeavor, suggesting a holistic view of intellectual pursuits. The arrangement implies a hierarchy – the central figures appear more prominent, perhaps representing core disciplines – while the others contribute to a broader tapestry of scholarly activity. The presence of women in various roles is noteworthy; it suggests an inclusive approach to education and learning, which was not always common during the period this work likely originates from. The overall impression is one of reverence for knowledge and its power to elevate humanity.