Oedipus and the Sphinx Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres (1780-1867)
Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres – Oedipus and the Sphinx
Edit attribution
Image taken from other album: gallerix.org/s/991555443/N/76322610/
Download full size: 3533×4606 px (4,4 Mb)
Painter: Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres
Location: Louvre (Musée du Louvre), Paris.
Album navigation:
Engres based his famous work on the widespread ancient Greek legend of the Sphinx. The Sphinx is a fearsome monster, possessing a woman’s head and charms, but with a lion’s torso, a rattlesnake’s tail, and enormous white wings. Every traveler who wanted to come to Thebes, this monster had a famous riddle about the animal that can walk on two, three and four legs. Travelers unable to guess the truth were always devoured by the Sphinx monster. The ancient Greek hero Oedipus managed to give the correct answer, to the riddle of the Sphinx and in response the monster jumped off the top of the mountain and crashed against the rocks. The tragic and sad story of Oedipus’ life, recounting his arrival in Thebes, the murder of his own father through ignorance of his loved ones, as well as his hasty marriage to his own mother and the birth of four children in incest, has often enough caused artists to paint about it.
ArtClub
Best Contemporary Atists
Description of the painting Oedipus and the Sphinx by Jean Auguste Engres
Engres based his famous work on the widespread ancient Greek legend of the Sphinx. The Sphinx is a fearsome monster, possessing a woman’s head and charms, but with a lion’s torso, a rattlesnake’s tail, and enormous white wings.
Every traveler who wanted to come to Thebes, this monster had a famous riddle about the animal that can walk on two, three and four legs. Travelers unable to guess the truth were always devoured by the Sphinx monster.
The ancient Greek hero Oedipus managed to give the correct answer, to the riddle of the Sphinx and in response the monster jumped off the top of the mountain and crashed against the rocks.
The tragic and sad story of Oedipus’ life, recounting his arrival in Thebes, the murder of his own father through ignorance of his loved ones, as well as his hasty marriage to his own mother and the birth of four children in incest, has often enough caused artists to paint about it. Oedipus was subsequently banished by his own children from Thebes.
While working on the composition of his famous painting, Engres decides to depict the moment of Oedipus’ mental duel with the monster, at the price of which was Oedipus’ life and the freedom of the city. The monster raided Thebes, but no one was able to defeat him in a mental battle.
In the right corner of his composition, the artist places an amazing woman with a lion’s body, the Sphinx, symbolizing its dark monstrous side as opposed to the good and light. The main character Oedipus, on the contrary, is illuminated by the sunshine.
All the features of his face and body show a concentration, unwilling to retreat before the unperturbed Sphinx. He defeats him in a hay duel. Such a lively and bright face of the hero comes into contrast with the glassy impenetrable appearance of the Sphinx, resembling an antique statue.
You cannot comment Why?
To his left, partially obscured within shadow, sits an older figure, presumably a mentor or guide. This individual’s posture is hunched, their face etched with lines suggesting age and wisdom. They appear to be listening intently to the younger mans words, though their expression remains ambiguous – perhaps a mixture of understanding, skepticism, or even concern.
The background is dark and cavernous, hinting at an enclosed space – a symbolic representation of the intellectual challenge being confronted. A glimpse of what appears to be a monumental structure can be discerned in the upper right corner, its scale dwarfing the figures below. This architectural element suggests a larger context, perhaps representing the weight of tradition or the formidable nature of the problem at hand.
The subtexts within this painting revolve around themes of knowledge, mentorship, and the burden of intellectual discovery. The youthful figure’s nudity can be interpreted as symbolic of vulnerability and openness to learning, while his gesture implies a process of unveiling truth. The older mans presence underscores the importance of guidance in navigating complex ideas, yet his shadowed face introduces an element of uncertainty regarding the acceptance or understanding of these revelations. The monumental structure looming in the background serves as a constant reminder of the vastness of knowledge and the potential for intellectual hubris. Overall, the work explores the dynamic between youthful inquiry and established wisdom, suggesting that true understanding requires both courage and humility.