Paul Cezanne – STILL LIFE WITH APPLES,1895-98, MOMA NY,VENTURI 736
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A shallow bowl, positioned towards the center, holds additional fruit, primarily pears, further contributing to the overall impression of plentifulness. To the right, a set of cylindrical objects, possibly glasses or vases, stands upright, their forms simplified and rendered in pale tones that blend with the surrounding light.
Dominating the left side of the canvas is a large, heavily draped textile. The folds are substantial, creating significant volume and obscuring any potential background beyond. This fabric introduces a complex interplay of light and shadow, its surface appearing both weighty and subtly translucent. The pattern within the drapery – a series of swirling lines and shapes – adds visual interest without providing clear representational detail.
The artist’s handling of paint is notable. Brushstrokes are visible throughout, contributing to a textured surface that emphasizes the materiality of the objects depicted. Theres an intentional flattening of perspective; depth isnt created through traditional techniques like linear convergence or atmospheric haze. Instead, spatial relationships are suggested through variations in color and tonal value.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore themes of domesticity and transience. The still life genre itself often carries connotations of quiet contemplation and a focus on everyday objects. The abundance of fruit might symbolize prosperity or the cyclical nature of seasons. However, the muted palette and somewhat melancholic atmosphere suggest a deeper reflection on mortality and the fleeting quality of beauty. The heavy drapery could be interpreted as a symbolic barrier between the viewer and the subject matter, hinting at an underlying sense of isolation or distance. Ultimately, the painting invites contemplation rather than offering definitive answers, leaving room for individual interpretation regarding its emotional resonance.