Mather Brown – Portrait of Major John Norton as Mohawk Chief Teyoninhokarawen
c.1805. 91×79
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
Album navigation:

На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s attire is complex and layered, suggesting a deliberate construction of identity. A feathered headdress dominates the composition, its white plumes adding height and visual interest. This headwear is interwoven with fabric bands displaying patterns that blend European and Indigenous aesthetics. Around his neck, a choker adorned with what seems to be a metallic emblem hangs prominently. The garment itself appears to be a blue coat or robe, embellished with intricate beadwork or chainmail detailing along the front panels. A silk scarf is loosely knotted at his throat, adding another layer of texture and visual complexity.
The artist’s rendering of the mans features suggests an attempt to portray him as both European and Indigenous. His facial structure aligns with European characteristics, yet there is a careful softening of edges, perhaps intended to evoke a sense of connection to Native American ideals of beauty or stoicism. The skin tone is rendered in a way that avoids caricature, instead presenting a nuanced depiction of ethnicity.
Subtleties within the painting hint at a complex interplay of power and representation. The combination of European military insignia (implied by his title) with Indigenous ceremonial dress suggests an attempt to bridge two distinct cultural identities. This blending could be interpreted as a symbolic assertion of authority, a negotiation between colonial and Native American worlds, or perhaps even a performance designed for a specific audience.
The background’s indistinct nature further contributes to the paintings ambiguity. The lack of clear spatial context removes the subject from any immediate setting, elevating him to a more universal, almost allegorical status. This deliberate vagueness allows for multiple interpretations and invites reflection on themes of cultural identity, representation, and the complexities of intercultural relations during a period of significant historical transition.