Who do people think I am 2. Vasily Polenov (1844-1927)

The composition presents a scene unfolding outdoors, likely within a landscape characterized by dense foliage and subdued light. Three figures dominate the visual field; their interaction appears central to the narrative implied by the work.
On the right stands a man distinguished by his attire – a white tunic layered beneath a flowing robe, topped with a distinctive turban. He holds an object in his hand, possibly a scroll or a small book, and seems engaged in speaking, his head tilted slightly as if addressing those before him. His expression is difficult to discern definitively due to the paintings style, but it conveys a sense of authority or perhaps measured explanation.
Two other figures are positioned closer to the viewer, facing the man on the right. Their clothing suggests a more modest social standing; they wear simpler garments in earth tones. They appear attentive, their heads turned towards the speaker, though their facial expressions remain ambiguous – a mixture of curiosity and perhaps skepticism or deference can be interpreted. The positioning of these figures creates a dynamic between them and the central figure, suggesting a power imbalance or an exchange of ideas.
The artist employed a technique that emphasizes texture and obscures detail. Brushstrokes are visible throughout, creating a somewhat hazy effect which softens edges and contributes to a sense of immediacy. The color palette is restrained, dominated by browns, ochres, and muted greens, reinforcing the impression of a natural setting and contributing to an overall somber mood.
Subtly, the painting seems to explore themes of perception and interpretation. The title suggests that this scene represents how others view or understand someone – the man in the turban – and the interaction between him and the other figures highlights the potential for misunderstanding or differing perspectives. The ambiguity inherent in the facial expressions and the obscured details invites viewers to project their own interpretations onto the narrative, questioning the nature of truth and representation.