Konstantin Makovsky – Funeral of a child
1872. 59,5 x 73
Location: Art Museum of M.P.Kroshitsky, Sevastopol (Художественный музей им. М.П.Крошицкого).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Похороны ребенка. 1872. Холст, масло 59,5 x 73. Севастопольский художественный музей имени М. П. Крошицкого
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a cluster of figures positioned closest to the viewer. Several women hold each other, some cradling infants in their arms, suggesting a shared sense of grief and vulnerability. A man stands slightly apart from this group, his posture conveying profound sorrow; he appears to be supporting another man who is leaning heavily on him. Further back, more individuals are visible, forming a loose procession that extends towards the horizon. The arrangement suggests a community united in mourning.
The artist has employed a muted color palette dominated by earthy tones – browns, greens, and grays – which reinforces the melancholic mood. Light falls unevenly across the scene, highlighting certain figures while leaving others shrouded in shadow, adding to the emotional complexity. The landscape itself is rendered with a degree of realism, yet it feels somewhat desolate, mirroring the internal state of those present.
Beyond the immediate depiction of grief, the painting seems to explore themes of community, loss, and the cyclical nature of life and death within a rural context. The presence of young children among the mourners underscores the universality of sorrow and its impact across generations. There is an element of stoicism in the figures’ expressions; they are not given to overt displays of emotion but rather convey their grief through posture and quiet solidarity.
The compositions depth, achieved through the receding line of figures towards the distant village, creates a sense of perspective and emphasizes the scale of communal loss. The overall effect is one of profound sadness tempered by an underlying resilience – a testament to the enduring strength of human connection in the face of tragedy.