Popova – painterly architectonics ii 1917
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The surface texture appears somewhat rough, suggesting an impasto application of paint. This contributes to a sense of physicality and tactility within the work. The edges of the shapes are not sharply defined; instead, they possess a softened quality that blurs their boundaries and introduces ambiguity regarding depth.
Here we see a deliberate avoidance of representational imagery. There is no discernible subject matter beyond the arrangement of these abstract forms. This absence invites contemplation on the nature of structure itself – the way elements can be organized to create a sense of order or tension, even in the absence of narrative content. The overlapping planes suggest an architectural sensibility; one might envision abstracted building facades or urban landscapes. However, the lack of perspective and the flattened quality of the forms deny any illusionistic depth.
The subtexts potentially revolve around themes of construction, deconstruction, and the exploration of spatial relationships. The interlocking nature of the shapes could be interpreted as a metaphor for interconnectedness or interdependence. The muted color palette contributes to a sense of introspection and quiet contemplation, while the rough texture adds an element of raw materiality. Ultimately, the work seems less concerned with conveying a specific message than with exploring the formal possibilities of abstract composition.