Roerich N.K. – The Last King (empty throne)
1922. Canvas, oil tempera. 92 x 142.5 cm.
Location: Collection AV Melnikova. Russia.Moskva
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is structured around an empty throne positioned centrally within the room. It stands on a raised platform, further emphasizing its significance while simultaneously highlighting its vacancy. To the left of the throne, a solitary figure in green armor strides forward, facing the vacant seat. The unusual coloration of this individual immediately draws attention; his verdant hue contrasts sharply with the prevailing earth tones and creates an unsettling visual discordance. He does not appear to be interacting with anything within the room, but rather seems to be traversing it with purpose, suggesting a role as observer or perhaps even a harbinger.
The architecture itself is imposing, characterized by tall columns and a high ceiling that reinforces the sense of grandeur and formality. However, this grandeur feels hollow; the emptiness of the throne and the muted lighting contribute to an atmosphere of melancholy and loss. The placement of furniture – a chair positioned near the right edge of the frame – appears almost incidental, adding to the overall feeling of abandonment.
Subtexts within the work revolve around themes of power, absence, and historical memory. The empty throne clearly signifies a lack of authority or leadership; it speaks to a transition, a fall from grace, or perhaps even an ending. The green figure’s presence introduces an element of uncertainty – is he a symbol of renewal, a reminder of conflict, or simply another transient observer in this desolate space? The numerous framed images on the wall suggest a weight of history and tradition, yet their obscurity implies that these traditions are either forgotten, suppressed, or rendered meaningless by present circumstances. Overall, the painting evokes a sense of profound loss and an unsettling contemplation of what remains when power is relinquished or extinguished.