Part 4 Prado Museum – Rombouts, Theodoor -- El charlatán sacamuelas
1620 1625, 118 cm x 223 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The lighting scheme is dramatic, employing stark contrasts between illuminated areas and deep shadows – a technique which intensifies the emotional impact and directs attention to key elements within the scene. The dentist’s face is brightly lit, highlighting his intense focus and perhaps suggesting an element of performative confidence. Conversely, the patients face is partially obscured by shadow, emphasizing his vulnerability.
A diverse group of onlookers surrounds the central action. Their reactions range from detached amusement to genuine concern. One man, wearing a turban, appears to be enjoying a snack while observing the procedure, adding a layer of unsettling nonchalance to the scene. A soldier stands nearby, armed and watchful, suggesting an element of potential danger or social control. The varied attire of the onlookers indicates a cross-section of society – from the well-dressed gentleman in the feathered hat to the more plainly dressed figures on the left.
The table upon which the patient lies is laden with instruments – a collection of pliers, bowls, and other tools that suggest a rudimentary and potentially unreliable medical practice. The presence of these implements underscores the precariousness of the situation and invites questions about the legitimacy of the dentist’s skills.
Subtly, the painting seems to critique societal attitudes towards healthcare and the exploitation of vulnerable individuals. It could be interpreted as a commentary on the prevalence of charlatanism and the lack of regulation in certain professions. The theatrical presentation of the scene – the dramatic lighting, the varied expressions of the onlookers – suggests that this is not merely a depiction of a medical procedure but rather a staged spectacle designed to entertain and perhaps even to satirize. The overall effect is one of unsettling realism combined with a touch of dark humor.