Part 4 Prado Museum – Carducho, Vicente -- Martirio del padre Andrés, prior de la Cartuja de Seiz
1626 1632, 336,5 cm x 297 cm, Lienzo, Lienzo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has arranged several individuals around the suspended man. To the left, two men dressed in turbans and loose-fitting garments appear to be actively involved in the act of restraint or execution. Their postures convey a sense of purposeful action, though their faces remain largely obscured, contributing to an atmosphere of impersonal cruelty. A third figure, positioned on a wooden ladder, seems to be assisting with the process.
On the right side of the painting, a man in elaborate red and gold robes reclines, seemingly observing the scene with detached interest. Beside him sits a dog, its posture mirroring the overall sense of resignation and quiet suffering that permeates the work. Further back, behind a barred enclosure, additional figures are visible, some appearing to be onlookers while others seem poised for further action. The presence of weaponry – a scythe is clearly visible – hints at potential violence beyond what is immediately depicted.
The use of light and shadow is significant. A strong light source illuminates the central figure, emphasizing his vulnerability and highlighting the texture of his habit. This contrasts with the darker areas surrounding him, which obscure details and create a sense of depth and foreboding. The architectural setting – the imposing wall and the barred enclosure – reinforces the feeling of confinement and oppression.
Subtextually, the painting explores themes of religious persecution, sacrifice, and power dynamics. The contrast between the purity symbolized by the white habit and the brutality of the surrounding figures suggests a conflict between faith and worldly authority. The detached observer in red robes may represent political or secular forces indifferent to the suffering of the individual. The dog’s presence could be interpreted as a symbol of loyalty or, conversely, as an indicator of the abandonment felt by the victim. Overall, the work conveys a powerful narrative of injustice and unwavering faith in the face of adversity.