Part 4 Prado Museum – Ribera y Fernández, Juan Antonio -- Cincinato abandona el arado para dictar leyes a Roma
1806, 160 cm x 215 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The setting is rural; a modest structure and a wooden fence suggest a humble origin for this encounter. A large tree dominates the background, its foliage partially obscuring a landscape that hints at rolling hills and distant fields. An ox and a horse are present, tethered nearby – animals traditionally associated with labor and agricultural life. The presence of these beasts reinforces the notion of abandoning a pastoral existence for civic responsibility.
The figures surrounding the central man display varying degrees of emotion and engagement. Some appear hesitant or concerned, while others seem to be actively participating in the exchange. One figure, positioned on the left side of the canvas, leads a white horse, suggesting a transition from personal property to public service. The lighting is dramatic, highlighting the central figures and casting shadows that add depth and complexity to the scene.
Subtleties within the painting suggest a narrative beyond a simple depiction of power transfer. The contrast between the unclothed figure’s physical labor and the formal attire of the Roman officials speaks to themes of virtue, duty, and the sacrifices required for leadership. The gesture of acceptance – the clasping of hands – implies a reluctant but necessary agreement, hinting at internal conflict or a sense of obligation.
The overall effect is one of solemnity and gravitas. It conveys a moment of pivotal decision-making, where personal desires are set aside in favor of the greater good. The artist’s careful arrangement of figures and objects creates a visual hierarchy that emphasizes the weight of this historical juncture, inviting contemplation on the responsibilities inherent in leadership and the tension between individual life and public service.