Jules Pascin – Nannies with a Child
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a loose, expressive style with visible brushstrokes and a limited palette dominated by greens, blues, and muted earth tones. This approach lends an air of spontaneity and informality to the depiction. The foliage – represented through broad strokes suggesting trees and shrubs – forms a backdrop that frames the figures, creating depth and establishing a sense of enclosure.
The two women are differentiated in appearance; one has lighter skin tone while the other is darker-skinned. They appear to be attending to the child, who sits on the bench between them. The gesture of the woman on the right – her arm extended outwards – suggests an act of reassurance or playful interaction with the child.
The drawing’s subtexts are complex and open to interpretation. The presence of two women in a caregiving role immediately raises questions about social dynamics, class structures, and familial relationships. Given the historical context often associated with such depictions, it is plausible that this scene alludes to the relationship between domestic staff and the families they served. However, the artist’s choice to portray these figures without overt markers of servitude – their relaxed postures and shared space – complicates any straightforward reading.
The setting itself contributes to the drawings meaning. The garden or park suggests a degree of privilege and access to leisure that might be denied to those in service roles. Yet, the informal nature of the scene also hints at a more intimate connection between these individuals than one might expect based solely on their social positions.
Ultimately, the drawing invites contemplation about power dynamics, representation, and the complexities of human relationships within a specific historical and societal framework. The artist’s deliberate ambiguity allows for multiple interpretations, encouraging viewers to consider the nuances of class, race, and familial bonds.