Beryl Cook – C34 Dining Out
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The central focus lies on two women positioned near the foreground. One, kneeling and holding aloft a bottle of champagne, dominates the visual space. Her expression conveys a mixture of boisterous energy and perhaps a touch of manic glee. The other woman, seated at the table, seems to react with a somewhat bewildered or uncomfortable countenance. This dynamic creates an immediate tension between exuberance and restraint.
The surrounding figures contribute to the paintings peculiar atmosphere. Many display expressions ranging from polite amusement to thinly veiled discomfort. Several men in suits appear stiff and detached, while others seem to be observing the unfolding scene with a mixture of curiosity and apprehension. The waiter, positioned behind the kneeling woman, maintains an impassive expression, adding to the sense of theatricality.
The artist’s use of color is notable. A palette of muted tones – greens, browns, and creams – is punctuated by the bright green of the champagne bottle label and the dark hues of the formal wear. This contrast draws attention to specific elements while contributing to a slightly artificial feel. The paintings on the wall behind the diners add another layer of visual complexity, their subjects appearing somewhat distorted or unsettling in their own right.
Subtextually, the painting seems to critique notions of wealth, social performance, and the anxieties inherent within them. The forced joviality and exaggerated gestures suggest a veneer of happiness masking underlying tensions. The champagne bottle, a symbol of luxury and celebration, is wielded with an almost aggressive energy, hinting at a desperation for enjoyment or validation. The awkwardness in the expressions of many figures implies that this display of affluence may be more performative than genuine. Ultimately, the work invites contemplation on the complexities of social rituals and the often-uncomfortable realities behind them.