Giulio Romano – The Battle of Zama, 202 BC
1570-80 oil on canvas
Location: Pushkin State Museum, Moscow (ГМИИ им. Пушкина).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a muted color palette, primarily consisting of earthy tones – browns, greens, and ochres – which contribute to the overall impression of grim realism. The limited use of brighter colors, such as red for blood and some armor details, serves to highlight moments of violence and drama. Light falls unevenly across the scene, creating areas of shadow that obscure certain figures and add to the feeling of confusion and turmoil.
The elephants are a particularly striking element. They loom large within the composition, their sheer size emphasizing the scale of the battle and the potential for devastation they represent. Warriors atop these beasts appear both powerful and vulnerable, demonstrating the precariousness of their position amidst the melee. The presence of archers on the elephants suggests ranged attacks contributing to the overall carnage.
A significant portion of the left side is occupied by a large banner or standard, its design unclear but suggesting leadership or allegiance within one of the warring factions. This element draws the eye and provides a visual anchor in the otherwise turbulent scene.
Subtly, the painting conveys more than just a depiction of physical conflict. The sheer number of figures and their individual expressions – ranging from grim determination to evident pain – suggest themes of human suffering and the brutal realities of warfare. The lack of clear distinction between combatants, with bodies intermingled regardless of allegiance, implies a shared fate for all involved in such large-scale conflicts. There is an underlying sense of futility; despite the intensity of the fighting, the outcome remains uncertain, and the cost in human life appears immense. The composition’s density and lack of clear perspective contribute to a feeling of claustrophobia, mirroring the overwhelming nature of war itself.