Rocot Fyodor - Portrait of Peter III
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a figure clad in an elaborate uniform – dark green coat adorned with gold embroidery, red cuffs, and pale trousers tucked into high boots. A blue sash, indicative of princely rank, crosses his chest, secured by a large medal or order. The tricorn hat, tilted slightly forward, contributes to the overall impression of military bearing. He leans on a sword, its hilt embellished with decorative elements, draped over what seems to be a fur-lined cloak or cushion.
The background is rendered in a looser style than the figure itself. A hazy blue sky dominates, punctuated by indistinct forms that might represent distant hills or fortifications. In the lower right corner, small figures on horseback are barely discernible, suggesting a military encampment or perhaps a scene of battle viewed from afar. This deliberate blurring of the background serves to isolate the subject and draw attention to his presence.
The artist’s use of light is significant. The figure is illuminated by a strong, frontal light source that highlights the textures of his clothing and reveals subtle details in his face. Shadows are present but subdued, contributing to an overall sense of formality and dignity.
Subtleties within the portrait suggest more than just a straightforward depiction of power. The man’s expression lacks warmth; it is neither overtly friendly nor hostile, but rather conveys a certain aloofness or perhaps even weariness. The somewhat awkward positioning of his hands – one resting on the sword, the other loosely at his side – lacks spontaneity and reinforces this sense of formality. The indistinct background, while visually pleasing, also creates a feeling of detachment; he is separate from the world around him, elevated above it by his position. This separation could be interpreted as a commentary on the burdens or isolation inherent in leadership.
The overall effect is one of controlled grandeur – a carefully constructed image designed to project authority and status, while simultaneously hinting at a more complex psychological portrait beneath the surface.