The Artist – 1875 Édouard Manet (1832-1883)
Édouard Manet – The Artist - 1875
Edit attribution
Download full size: 2835×4255 px (1,3 Mb)
Painter: Édouard Manet
Location: Museum of Art (Museu de Arte), São Paulo.
The full-length portrait of an unusual man is an atypical work for Manet, executed in an uncharacteristically realistic manner, unique in its own way. The two artists, Manet and Marcellin Debutin, met one day at the New Athens café. They formed a true friendship. Marcellin painted a portrait of Manet in the dry needle technique, and Manet painted his friend, immortalizing his somewhat strange appearance. In Manet’s painting we see a tall man dressed in a gray, long, visibly worn coat in places.
Description of Eduard Manet’s painting The Artist
The full-length portrait of an unusual man is an atypical work for Manet, executed in an uncharacteristically realistic manner, unique in its own way. The two artists, Manet and Marcellin Debutin, met one day at the New Athens café. They formed a true friendship. Marcellin painted a portrait of Manet in the dry needle technique, and Manet painted his friend, immortalizing his somewhat strange appearance.
In Manet’s painting we see a tall man dressed in a gray, long, visibly worn coat in places. A black felt hat casually covers his black, lush, curly hair, and his face is framed by a somewhat ungroomed beard. But all this is just the scenery, unimportant details of the appearance, indicating only a low material income of the free artist.
The main thing in the portrait, as it should be, swarthy face and black, sad eyes, looking tiredly from under the heavy lids. Underneath the external slovenliness you can see a true aristocrat, a man of high spiritual status, cultured and educated. Manet emphasizes this with an unexpectedly snow-white scarf around the artist’s neck. Another bright, eye-catching accent is the hands. And here is a large, white dog in the bright light on a rather gloomy and dark background, obviously, carries an additional semantic load, understandable only to the author.
Marcellin Debutin lived for some time in Florence, inherited a huge castle, was hospitable and generous. He was fond of poetry, composed poetic dramas, with pleasure and professionally made magnificent copies of paintings by famous artists. Somehow, unbeknownst to himself, he went bankrupt, came to Paris, occupied the former plumber’s workshop, and settled in the horrible, uninhabitable conditions of a dirty workers’ barrack.
Loading himself like a pack animal, he worked hard, but for a pittance. He lived like a beggar. It was during this time that the two artists met.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The man’s expression is difficult to decipher; it conveys a mixture of weariness and introspection. His gaze seems directed inward rather than outward, hinting at a contemplative state. The lighting emphasizes the texture of his hair and beard, which appear somewhat unkempt, contributing to an overall impression of a man absorbed in his work.
To the left of the figure stands a dog, also rendered with loose brushstrokes and muted tones. It appears to be panting or drinking from a bowl placed on the ground, adding a touch of domesticity and perhaps symbolizing companionship or loyalty. The indistinct background contributes to the sense that the focus is entirely on the man and his immediate surroundings; it does not offer any specific location or narrative context.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around themes of artistic identity and the solitary nature of creative labor. The inclusion of the dog suggests a need for connection, while the blurred background implies a detachment from the external world. The artist depicted himself in an unidealized manner, eschewing traditional portrait conventions to present a more authentic representation of the working artist – a figure both dedicated to his craft and perhaps burdened by its demands. The deliberate lack of specificity regarding setting or time period allows for broader interpretations concerning the universal experience of artistic creation.