Boris Grigoriev – Vsevolod Meyerhol
1916. 247х168
Location: State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg (Государственный Русский Музей).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To his right, a second figure appears to be emerging from or being enveloped by a swirling mass of red and orange fabric. This individual’s attire is more elaborate and flamboyant, suggesting a theatrical performer or perhaps someone associated with the arts. Their facial features are partially obscured, contributing to an air of mystery and potential vulnerability. The pose suggests struggle or entrapment within this vibrant, chaotic environment.
The color palette is dominated by contrasting hues: the cool blacks and whites of the formal attire juxtaposed against the fiery reds and oranges surrounding the second figure. This contrast creates a visual tension that reinforces the sense of disparity between the two individuals. A pale blue background provides a stark backdrop, further isolating the figures and emphasizing their individual characteristics.
The artist’s use of distorted perspective and elongated forms contributes to an overall feeling of unease and disorientation. The lack of clear spatial relationships suggests a dreamlike or symbolic realm rather than a realistic depiction of space.
Subtly, the painting seems to explore themes of social hierarchy, performance versus reality, and perhaps even the complexities of artistic creation itself. The formally dressed man could represent societal norms or established power structures, while the figure within the swirling fabric embodies creativity, passion, or potentially, the sacrifices demanded by a life dedicated to art. The interaction between these two figures is ambiguous; it’s unclear whether they are collaborators, adversaries, or simply exist in separate spheres of experience. Ultimately, the work invites contemplation on the relationship between individual identity and external forces.