Hermitage ~ part 10 – Roulandson, Thomas - Ask wife
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a woman standing behind a makeshift barrier constructed from wooden planks. She appears robust, her posture suggesting a degree of defiance or perhaps weary resignation as she addresses the assembled men. Her attire is simple – a chemise visible beneath an apron and a bonnet perched atop her head. A small dog sits attentively at her feet, adding a touch of domesticity to the otherwise chaotic scene.
The men are rendered with varying degrees of detail and expression. Many wear hats or caps, their faces contorted in expressions ranging from intense scrutiny to amusement. Some lean heavily on canes, suggesting age or infirmity. Their clothing is similarly varied, indicating different social strata within a common demographic – likely middle-aged gentlemen. The artist has emphasized the men’s physical characteristics; many possess prominent noses, jowls, and receding hairlines, contributing to an overall impression of caricature.
The background remains largely undefined, consisting primarily of blank space which serves to isolate the figures and heighten their prominence. This lack of contextual detail directs attention solely towards the interaction between the woman and the men. The artist’s use of watercolor allows for a lightness in tone, but also facilitates rapid sketching and expressive linework that emphasizes the exaggerated features of the subjects.
Subtly, the drawing seems to comment on societal dynamics – specifically, the power imbalance between men and women within a domestic or social setting. The womans position behind the barrier suggests confinement or restriction, while the throng of male onlookers implies a sense of scrutiny and control. Her expression is difficult to decipher definitively; it could be interpreted as either defiance, exasperation, or simply an attempt at maintaining composure under pressure.
The scene’s humor arises from the absurdity of the situation – the sheer number of men gathered around one woman, their expressions suggesting a mixture of curiosity, amusement, and perhaps even entitlement. The drawing likely functions as social commentary, satirizing prevailing attitudes towards women and highlighting the potential for imbalance within interpersonal relationships.