Hermitage ~ part 13 – Shhonebek, Adrian. The siege of the Turkish fortress of Azov by Russian troops in 1696
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A group of mounted soldiers occupies the left side of the scene. They are depicted with a sense of urgency, some gesturing towards the fortress while others appear to be directing troop movements. Their attire suggests a hierarchical structure within the military ranks; officers are distinguished by their more elaborate uniforms and positions of authority. The horses themselves are rendered with attention to anatomy and movement, contributing to the dynamism of the scene.
To the right, a cluster of individuals is gathered around what appears to be a makeshift platform or elevated position. A man in civilian attire stands prominently, seemingly observing the events unfolding below. He gestures emphatically towards the fortress, possibly offering strategic advice or commentary. The inclusion of this figure suggests an attempt to portray not only the military action but also the intellectual and logistical aspects of the siege.
The lower portion of the image is filled with a chaotic array of soldiers on foot, some carrying weapons, others tending to equipment. A large ship is visible near the waters edge, likely involved in supplying or reinforcing the besieging forces. The artist has employed a muted color palette, dominated by earth tones and browns, which reinforces the somber and serious nature of the event being depicted.
The extensive background landscape, rendered with considerable detail, creates a sense of depth and vastness. It also serves to emphasize the scale of the operation and the challenging terrain faced by the besieging army. The inclusion of what appears to be smoke rising from the fortress suggests ongoing conflict within its walls.
Subtly embedded at the bottom are lines of text in an unfamiliar script, likely providing a historical account or commentary on the depicted events. These inscriptions contribute to the paintings function as both a visual record and a narrative document. The overall impression is one of a meticulously planned and executed military campaign, presented with a degree of realism intended to convey its significance and impact.