Van Gogh, Vincent – Cabins Hermitage ~ part 02
Hermitage ~ part 02 – Van Gogh, Vincent - Cabins
Edit attribution
Download full size: 1476×1206 px (0,7 Mb)
Back to album: Hermitage ~ part 02
At the height of his artistic talent, Van Gogh painted the landscape "The Shacks." This occurred just months before the genius painter’s death. In May 1890, the Dutch artist was living in the town of Auvers in northern France. The mild climate in this small French colony must have had a positive effect on Van Gogh’s health. What can be accurately ascertained is that this area was beneficial to the painter’s creative inspiration.
A description of Vincent van Gogh’s painting "The Huts"
At the height of his artistic talent, Van Gogh painted the landscape "The Shacks." This occurred just months before the genius painter’s death. In May 1890, the Dutch artist was living in the town of Auvers in northern France. The mild climate in this small French colony must have had a positive effect on Van Gogh’s health. What can be accurately ascertained is that this area was beneficial to the painter’s creative inspiration. He produces more than 30 new creations.
"The Shacks" are painted as more than just a cityscape of Auvers. These humble buildings surrounded by nature reminded the artist of his native Holland. The heartfelt affection and nostalgia Van Gogh embodied on the canvas.
In letters to his brother Theo, the painter explained what is depicted in the painting "Cabin". He wrote that he chose to translate on the canvas old huts, which are covered with straw. For the foreground of the picture he chose the loaves and peas in bloom, and for the far background he chose the hills and the sky.
We see in the 1890 canvas the realization of Van Gogh’s idea. It depicts a dynamic picture of nature. Several one-story huts are arranged in different angles. Small houses look cozy and homely. Smoke clouds swirl from chimneys on thatched roofs.
The immediate background is carpeted with grass, with white peas in bloom and wheat sprouting. In the distance, steep hills of grass and sparse trees rise into the distance. The bluish sky is in some places covered by thick looming clouds, and somewhere it changes to bright ultramarine.
Picture of the "Cabin" is distinguished by the tranquility of color. Van Gogh preferred the faint natural colors: light green, olive, blue, pale yellow. Stand out on such a background red roof of a hut.
The landscape is painted with dynamic strokes, with some anxiety and tension. The content of the painting swirls and shimmers, making the landscape truly natural and alive.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















COMMENTS: 8 Ответы
I dont consider Van Goghs paintings to be great art. I could probably paint five or six similar pieces in a day, and anyone who has a brush and some paints could do the same. In short, his paintings are popular now because they are old and extravagant. Theres absolutely no sense of proper proportion in them...
Olga, I completely agree with you. I wouldnt hang his paintings in my house even if they were free!
Have you ever seen them in person? Now, draw them and lets see how talented you are!
The most important thing is not how something is depicted, but what the artist wanted to convey with it. In paintings by great artists, there is something more than just a combination of colors on canvas.
I was a preschooler when my mother started taking me to the Hermitage Museum. The most striking impressions from that time were Rembrandt and Van Gogh.
As we grow older, we lose our direct perception, change our views and preferences, but Van Gogh has remained one of my favorite artists. In a letter, he wrote (Im quoting from memory): There is nothing more authentically artistic than loving people. His paintings are simply overflowing with this love, whether its a portrait, a hut, flowers, fields... Perhaps thats why looking at his paintings makes you feel so comfortable. His paintings evoke in me the associations with Bloks poems:
When I first saw,
Towards my eager dream,
Flares of dawn flew,
And an angelic trumpet soared high.
I have often heard bewildered comments about Van Goghs work, but lets not be mistaken: we could never write like that. There are people who use very intricate rhymes, but they will never become poets who sometimes dont even seem to rhyme at all.
Tatyana and Olga have no idea about the history of art or the groundbreaking impact of the Impressionists, whose influence is reflected in this painting. They probably prefer Dutch still lifes or hyperrealism.
Dont argue, the deceased really hated that.
Luckily, there are many artists in the world, and each viewer will find one they connect with. Love your own, and dont criticize others.
I look at the paintings and feel emotions that are difficult to express... But they are vibrant paintings. You cant help but keep looking at them.
You cannot comment Why?
The landscape surrounding the buildings is equally expressive. A foreground expanse of tall grass, rendered in vibrant greens and yellows, sweeps across the lower portion of the canvas. This field appears to undulate, contributing to a sense of movement and vitality within the scene. The hillside itself rises sharply behind the dwellings, its contours defined by thick impasto strokes that emphasize its ruggedness.
Above, the sky is turbulent, filled with swirling brushstrokes of blue and white. These energetic marks suggest an impending storm or a general atmospheric unrest. The light source appears to be diffused, casting soft shadows and preventing harsh contrasts. This contributes to a feeling of quiet melancholy rather than bright optimism.
The artist’s technique is notable for its expressive use of color and texture. Paint is applied in thick, visible strokes that create a palpable surface quality. These marks are not merely descriptive; they convey an emotional intensity, suggesting the artists subjective experience of the scene. The deliberate distortion of perspective and the exaggeration of forms further reinforce this sense of personal interpretation.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore themes of isolation and resilience. The dwellings, huddled together against the backdrop of a formidable landscape, evoke a feeling of vulnerability yet also suggest a quiet determination to endure. The turbulent sky might symbolize inner turmoil or external challenges faced by the inhabitants. The overall impression is one of a place both beautiful and harsh, offering a glimpse into a world shaped by both natural forces and human endeavor. Theres an underlying sense of longing present in the work; a desire for connection perhaps, or a yearning for solace within this isolated setting.