Jan Olis – Kitchen Interior
1645. hoogte 68.5 cm; breedte 81.5 cm, panel [materiaal: paneel]
Location: Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A man sits at the same table, slightly to the right of the woman. He holds a glass aloft, appearing to be in the midst of a toast or celebratory gesture. His expression is animated, suggesting conviviality and perhaps a moment of leisure amidst daily tasks. The presence of alcohol implies a degree of prosperity and relaxation within this setting.
A third figure, a young person, stands partially obscured in shadow along the right edge of the painting. Their posture appears somewhat withdrawn, their face largely hidden from view. This individuals placement contributes to a sense of depth and subtly introduces an element of quiet observation into the scene.
The table itself is laden with provisions: various vegetables – cabbages, root vegetables, and fruits – are scattered across its surface alongside several freshly caught fish. A large basket overflows with produce, further emphasizing abundance. The presence of these foodstuffs speaks to a household that is well-supplied and capable of sustaining itself.
The lighting in the painting is dramatic, concentrated primarily on the figures and the tables contents. This selective illumination creates areas of deep shadow, contributing to an atmosphere of intimacy and enclosure. The darkness also serves to highlight the textures of the fabrics – the woman’s apron, the man’s coat, and the rough-hewn wood of the furniture – adding a tactile quality to the scene.
Beyond the straightforward depiction of domestic life, the painting hints at social dynamics. The interaction between the woman and the dog suggests a nurturing role, while the mans celebratory gesture implies a moment of respite from labor. The shadowed figure’s presence introduces an element of ambiguity – are they a servant, a child, or simply another member of the household? This lack of explicit identification invites speculation about the social hierarchy within this domestic sphere. Overall, the work offers a glimpse into a world defined by simple pleasures, hard work, and quiet familial bonds.