Mauritshuis – Egbert van der Poel - A Fish Market
1650, 61.3×75 cm.
Egbert van der Poel (1621-1664)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see several stalls erected under makeshift awnings and roofs, arranged along the right side of the scene. These structures provide shelter for vendors displaying their wares – primarily fish, judging by the scattered remains on the ground and the activity of those handling them. A cluster of people surrounds these stalls, some examining the goods, others seemingly negotiating prices. The artist has captured a sense of lively interaction through varied postures and gestures.
To the left, a solitary figure stands near a pile of what appear to be fish carcasses, his back turned towards the viewer. This placement creates a subtle contrast with the energetic activity in the central area, suggesting perhaps a moment of quiet contemplation or weariness amidst the commercial clamor. A heron, rendered with considerable detail, is positioned nearby, likely attracted by the abundance of fish remains – an element that subtly reinforces the scene’s thematic focus.
The architecture visible in the background reveals a townscape characterized by gabled roofs and brick buildings typical of the period. A distinctive tower, topped with a lantern-like structure, punctuates the skyline, serving as a visual anchor for the composition. The sky above is overcast, lending a muted tonality to the scene and contributing to an overall atmosphere of realism rather than idealized beauty.
Subtly embedded within this depiction are hints of social commentary. The varying degrees of dress and activity among the figures suggest a range of economic statuses present in the community. The presence of the heron, a symbol often associated with patience and observation, might be interpreted as a comment on the cyclical nature of life and sustenance. Furthermore, the overall impression is one of everyday existence – a snapshot of ordinary people engaged in their livelihoods, devoid of overt drama or sentimentality. The painting’s strength lies not in grand narratives but in its meticulous rendering of a commonplace scene, revealing a quiet dignity within the mundane.