Part 2 National Gallery UK – Emile Jean Horace Vernet - The Battle of Jemappes
1821
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the foreground, a cluster of figures occupies the central space. These appear to be officers on horseback, distinguished by their elaborate uniforms and attentive postures. They observe the unfolding action with an air of controlled authority, seemingly directing operations from a relatively safe distance. A wagon is positioned prominently near them, suggesting logistical support or perhaps serving as a temporary command post. The presence of artillery pieces and soldiers maneuvering around them indicates active combat.
Beyond this immediate group, the scene expands to reveal a wider panorama of military activity. Numerous figures – soldiers, horses, and carriages – are scattered across the terrain, engaged in what appears to be a rout or pursuit. Smoke billows from various points on the landscape, obscuring details but contributing to the overall sense of chaos and destruction. In the distance, a town is visible atop a rise, its buildings rendered with less detail than the foreground elements, yet providing a visual anchor for the composition. The architecture suggests a European settlement, likely the objective or strategic point of contention in this conflict.
The artist’s use of perspective emphasizes the scale and scope of the battle. The receding planes of the landscape draw the viewers eye towards the distant town, creating a sense of depth and vastness. The composition is not static; it conveys movement and dynamism through the arrangement of figures and the swirling patterns of smoke.
Subtleties within the painting hint at underlying themes beyond a simple depiction of military victory. The officers’ detached observation suggests a commentary on leadership and the distance between those who command and those who fight. The pervasive smoke, while indicative of battle, also obscures clarity – perhaps symbolizing the uncertainties and moral ambiguities inherent in warfare. The subdued color palette, dominated by earth tones and greys, reinforces the somber mood and underscores the human cost of conflict. The overall effect is one of controlled chaos, portraying a moment of decisive action within a larger narrative of struggle and consequence.