Charles-Joseph Natoire – Louise-Anne de Bourbon, Mlle de Charolais (1695-1758), in a monk’s robe, holding the chord of St. Francis
118х90
Location: Palace of Versailles (Château de Versailles), Paris.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The most striking element is undoubtedly the garment she wears. It’s a dark brown robe, characteristic of certain monastic orders, complete with a hood that frames her face. In her hands, she holds what seems to be a cord, reminiscent of those used by the Franciscan order as part of their vows and penitential practices. This detail immediately introduces an element of religious symbolism and potential allusion.
The setting is not overtly religious; it’s more akin to a secluded garden or woodland area. A table sits before her, laden with objects that add layers of complexity to the scene. We see what appears to be a small dish containing fruit, a cup, and other items arranged on a wooden surface. These objects suggest an element of domesticity and perhaps even indulgence, which contrasts with the austerity implied by the monastic attire.
The artist has paid particular attention to texture. The fabric of the robe is rendered with careful detail, conveying its weight and drape. Similarly, the foliage in the background possesses a certain softness, achieved through subtle gradations of color and tone. A delicate floral arrangement adorns her hair, a touch that introduces an element of femininity and refinement at odds with the perceived solemnity of the habit.
Subtleties within the portrait suggest a narrative beyond a simple depiction. The combination of religious symbolism (the cord) with elements of secular life (the table setting, the flowers) hints at a complex interplay between piety and worldly concerns. It’s possible to interpret this as an exploration of identity – perhaps a negotiation between societal expectations and personal devotion. The womans expression, neither overtly joyful nor sorrowful, contributes to this ambiguity, inviting contemplation on her inner state and the circumstances surrounding her portrayal. The overall effect is one of restrained emotion and quiet introspection, leaving room for multiple interpretations regarding the subject’s story and motivations.